DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Explorer vs 2000 Mercury Mountaineer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMercury
ExplorerModelMountaineer
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
3/5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
180 km/hTop speed177 km/h
3958 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
155 HPPower208 HP
298 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank83 lt
—Urban consumption15,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/70 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4429 mmLength4990 mm
1783 mmWidth1875 mm
1714 mmHeight1830 mm
1671 KgWeight1880 Kg
2593 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Explorer and 2000 Mercury Mountaineer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…