DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Expedition vs 1996 Chevrolet Tahoe Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Expedition

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

76.5–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeChevrolet
ExpeditionModelTahoe
2000Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
165 km/hTop speed160 km/h
5398 ccEngine displacement5733 cc
264 HPPower258 HP
474 NmTorque441 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
113 ltFuel tank114 lt
19,6 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
14,7 ltExtra-urban consumption13,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
265/70 R17Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5198 mmLength4788 mm
1996 mmWidth1958 mm
1992 mmHeight1839 mm
2555 KgWeight2220 Kg
3023 mmWheelbase2832 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Expedition and 1996 Chevrolet Tahoe approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Expedition leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…