1996 • Ford
Escort
Ford Escort 1.8 TD (70 Hp) 1996Overall Score42.25/100
1996 Ford Escort vs 1997 Kia Retona Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Kia
Retona
Kia Retona 2.0 D (87 Hp) 1997Overall Score42.5/100
WINNER
Kia Retona
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford EscortSpecificationKia Retona
FordMakeKia
EscortModelRetona
1996Model year1997
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Ford EscortSpecificationKia Retona
16,0 s0–100 km/h20,5 s
163 km/hTop speed120 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
70 HPPower87 HP
135 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford EscortSpecificationKia Retona
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption11,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,1 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford EscortSpecificationKia Retona
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford EscortSpecificationKia Retona
4293 mmLength4000 mm
1700 mmWidth1745 mm
1394 mmHeight1835 mm
1100 KgWeight1505 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2360 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Ford Escort and 1997 Kia Retona approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Retona leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…