DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Rover Mini MK vs 1996 Ford Escort Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Mini MK

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeFord
Mini MKModelEscort
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
148 km/hTop speed163 km/h
1273 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
63 HPPower70 HP
95 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
34 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
145/70 R12 QTyre size175/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3100 mmLength4293 mm
1440 mmWidth1700 mm
1351 mmHeight1394 mm
700 KgWeight1100 Kg
2035 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Rover Mini MK and 1996 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Mini MK leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…