DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Alpina B4 vs 2017 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

93.5–92.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alpina B4SpecificationJaguar XF
AlpinaMakeJaguar
B4ModelXF
2017Model year2017
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Alpina B4SpecificationJaguar XF
4,5 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
301 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
410 HPPower380 HP
600 NmTorque450 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Alpina B4SpecificationJaguar XF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank74 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
8,0 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Alpina B4SpecificationJaguar XF
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8 Switch-TronicGears8
245/30 ZR20; 265/30 ZR20Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Alpina B4SpecificationJaguar XF
4640 mmLength4954 mm
1825 mmWidth1987 mm
1380 mmHeight1457 mm
1840 KgWeight1710 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2960 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Alpina B4 and 2017 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…