DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jaguar XF vs 2017 Alpina B4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

92.5–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina B4
JaguarMakeAlpina
XFModelB4
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2

Performance

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina B4
5,3 s0–100 km/h4,5 s
250 km/hTop speed301 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
380 HPPower410 HP
450 NmTorque600 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina B4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina B4
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears8 Switch-Tronic
—Tyre size245/30 ZR20; 265/30 ZR20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina B4
4954 mmLength4640 mm
1987 mmWidth1825 mm
1457 mmHeight1380 mm
1710 KgWeight1840 Kg
2960 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jaguar XF and 2017 Alpina B4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…