DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Escape vs 2016 Mitsubishi Outlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Escape

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMitsubishi
EscapeModelOutlander
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,2 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2268 cc
168 HPPower150 HP
230 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/55 R17; 235/45 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4524 mmLength4695 mm
1839 mmWidth1810 mm
1684 mmHeight1680 mm
1594 KgWeight1600 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Escape and 2016 Mitsubishi Outlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Escape leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…