DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi Triton vs 2016 Ford Escape Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Escape

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
TritonModelEscape
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
136 HPPower168 HP
324 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank58 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/70 R16Tyre size235/55 R17; 235/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5280 mmLength4524 mm
1815 mmWidth1839 mm
1780 mmHeight1684 mm
1820 KgWeight1594 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi Triton and 2016 Ford Escape approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Escape leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…