DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Alpina B4 vs 2017 Jaguar F-type Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

93.5–92.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AlpinaMakeJaguar
B4ModelF-type
2017Model year2017
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

4,3 s0–100 km/h5,1 s
304 km/hTop speed275 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
440 HPPower400 HP
660 NmTorque460 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,3 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
8 Switch-TronicGears8
245/30 ZR20; 265/30 ZR20Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4482 mm
1825 mmWidth1923 mm
1380 mmHeight1308 mm
1915 KgWeight1694 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2622 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Alpina B4 and 2017 Jaguar F-type approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…