DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jaguar F-Pace vs 2017 Alpina B4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

92.5–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

JaguarMakeAlpina
F-PaceModelB4
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

5,5 s0–100 km/h4,3 s
250 km/hTop speed304 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
380 HPPower440 HP
450 NmTorque660 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,2 ltUrban consumption11,1 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears8 Switch-Tronic
—Tyre size245/30 ZR20; 265/30 ZR20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4731 mmLength4640 mm
—Width1825 mm
1652 mmHeight1380 mm
1861 KgWeight1915 Kg
2874 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jaguar F-Pace and 2017 Alpina B4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…