DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Ford EcoSport vs 2017 Volvo V90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford EcoSport

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolvo
EcoSportModelV90
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,2 s
0 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
166 HPPower150 HP
203 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16; 205/50 R17Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4273 mmLength4936 mm
1765 mmWidth1879 mm
1653 mmHeight1475 mm
1510 KgWeight—
2519 mmWheelbase2941 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Ford EcoSport and 2017 Volvo V90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford EcoSport leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…