2017 • Volvo
V90
Volvo V90 2.0 D3 (150 Hp) 2017Overall Score69.75/100
2017 Volvo V90 vs 2017 Ford EcoSport Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Ford
EcoSport
Ford EcoSport 2.0 Ti-VCT (166 Hp) 2017Overall Score70.5/100
WINNER
Ford EcoSport
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V90SpecificationFord EcoSport
VolvoMakeFord
V90ModelEcoSport
2017Model year2017
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V90SpecificationFord EcoSport
10,2 s0–100 km/h—
205 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
150 HPPower166 HP
320 NmTorque203 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V90SpecificationFord EcoSport
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank52 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V90SpecificationFord EcoSport
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size205/60 R16; 205/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V90SpecificationFord EcoSport
4936 mmLength4273 mm
1879 mmWidth1765 mm
1475 mmHeight1653 mm
—Weight1510 Kg
2941 mmWheelbase2519 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Volvo V90 and 2017 Ford EcoSport approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford EcoSport leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…