DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mini Countryman vs 2017 Ford EcoSport Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Countryman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.25–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeFord
CountrymanModelEcoSport
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
180 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
102 HPPower95 HP
180 NmTorque215 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank52 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption4,8 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/65 R16Tyre size205/60 R16; 205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4299 mmLength4273 mm
1822 mmWidth1765 mm
1557 mmHeight1650 mm
1290-1365 KgWeight1372 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2519 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mini Countryman and 2017 Ford EcoSport approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Countryman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…