DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford EcoSport vs 2016 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford EcoSport

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolkswagen
EcoSportModelPolo
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,3 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
172 km/hTop speed178 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
112 HPPower90 HP
140 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R16 92H; 205/50 R17 93WTyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4273 mmLength4390 mm
1765 mmWidth1699 mm
1648 mmHeight1467 mm
1351 KgWeight1163 Kg
2519 mmWheelbase2553 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford EcoSport and 2016 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford EcoSport leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…