DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Crown Victoria vs 1996 Holden Commodore Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Crown Victoria

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeHolden
Crown VictoriaModelCommodore
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
6Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,9 s
180 km/hTop speed210 km/h
4601 ccEngine displacement5034 cc
193 HPPower224 HP
353 NmTorque385 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank80 lt
18 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/70 R15 STyre size205/65 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5397 mmLength4861 mm
1976 mmWidth1794 mm
1440 mmHeight1448 mm
1720 KgWeight1450 Kg
2905 mmWheelbase2731 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Crown Victoria and 1996 Holden Commodore approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Crown Victoria leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…