DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Alpina B3 vs 2005 Acura TL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alpina B3SpecificationAcura TL
AlpinaMakeAcura
B3ModelTL
2003Model year2005
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Alpina B3SpecificationAcura TL
5,7 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
266 km/hTop speed225 km/h
3300 ccEngine displacement3210 cc
280 HPPower273 HP
335 NmTorque323 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Alpina B3SpecificationAcura TL
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank65 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
10,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Alpina B3SpecificationAcura TL
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR18Tyre size235/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Alpina B3SpecificationAcura TL
4471 mmLength4808 mm
1739 mmWidth1835 mm
1395 mmHeight1440 mm
1450 KgWeight1655 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2740 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Alpina B3 and 2005 Acura TL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…