DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Acura TL vs 2003 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Acura TLSpecificationAlpina B3
AcuraMakeAlpina
TLModelB3
2005Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Acura TLSpecificationAlpina B3
6,0 s0–100 km/h5,7 s
225 km/hTop speed266 km/h
3210 ccEngine displacement3300 cc
273 HPPower280 HP
323 NmTorque335 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Acura TLSpecificationAlpina B3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank63 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption16,1 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
—Average consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Acura TLSpecificationAlpina B3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/45 R17Tyre size225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Acura TLSpecificationAlpina B3
4808 mmLength4471 mm
1835 mmWidth1739 mm
1440 mmHeight1395 mm
1655 KgWeight1450 Kg
2740 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Acura TL and 2003 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…