1999 • Toyota
Cresta
Toyota Cresta 2.5 i V6 24V (200 Hp) 1999Overall Score67.5/100
1999 Toyota Cresta vs 2000 Ford Cougar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Cougar
Ford Cougar 2.5 i V6 24V ST 200 (205 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Ford Cougar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota CrestaSpecificationFord Cougar
ToyotaMakeFord
CrestaModelCougar
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Toyota CrestaSpecificationFord Cougar
—0–100 km/h7,8 s
0 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2496 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
200 HPPower205 HP
245 NmTorque234 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota CrestaSpecificationFord Cougar
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption14,6 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota CrestaSpecificationFord Cougar
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota CrestaSpecificationFord Cougar
4750 mmLength4700 mm
1755 mmWidth1780 mm
1420 mmHeight1340 mm
—Weight1390 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2705 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Toyota Cresta and 2000 Ford Cougar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Cougar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…