DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Cougar vs 1999 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Cougar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

68.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
CougarModelMondeo
2000Model year1999
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

7,8 s0–100 km/h7,7 s
230 km/hTop speed231 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
205 HPPower205 HP
234 NmTorque234 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank61 lt
14,6 ltUrban consumption14,4 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size215/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4700 mmLength4556 mm
1780 mmWidth1751 mm
1340 mmHeight1424 mm
1390 KgWeight1345 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2704 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Cougar and 1999 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Cougar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…