2000 • Ford
Cougar
Ford Cougar 2.0i 16V (131 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.5/100
2000 Ford Cougar vs 2000 BMW Z3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • BMW
Z3
BMW Z3 1.9 (118 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Ford Cougar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford CougarSpecificationBMW Z3
FordMakeBMW
CougarModelZ3
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
3Doors2
Performance
Ford CougarSpecificationBMW Z3
9,6 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
209 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
131 HPPower118 HP
178 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford CougarSpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank51 lt
11,6 ltUrban consumption11 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford CougarSpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford CougarSpecificationBMW Z3
4700 mmLength4050 mm
1777 mmWidth1740 mm
1320 mmHeight1288 mm
1315 KgWeight1220 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2446 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Cougar and 2000 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Cougar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…