1999 • Ford
Contour
Ford Contour 2.5i V6 24V LX (170 Hp) 1999Overall Score64.5/100
1999 Ford Contour vs 2000 Ford Cougar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Cougar
Ford Cougar 2.5i V6 24V (170 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Ford Cougar
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
64.5–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford ContourSpecificationFord Cougar
FordMakeFord
ContourModelCougar
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Ford ContourSpecificationFord Cougar
—0–100 km/h8,1 s
0 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2539 ccEngine displacement2544 cc
170 HPPower170 HP
224 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford ContourSpecificationFord Cougar
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption13,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford ContourSpecificationFord Cougar
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14 STyre size205/60 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Ford ContourSpecificationFord Cougar
4671 mmLength4700 mm
1755 mmWidth1770 mm
1384 mmHeight1320 mm
1257 KgWeight1390 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2705 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Ford Contour and 2000 Ford Cougar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Cougar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…