DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Alpina B3 vs 1999 Alpina B10 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

79.5–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alpina B3SpecificationAlpina B10
AlpinaMakeAlpina
B3ModelB10
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Alpina B3SpecificationAlpina B10
5,7 s0–100 km/h6,3 s
266 km/hTop speed262 km/h
3300 ccEngine displacement3300 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
335 NmTorque335 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Alpina B3SpecificationAlpina B10
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank70 lt
16,1 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
10,8 ltAverage consumption10,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Alpina B3SpecificationAlpina B10
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR18Tyre size235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Alpina B3SpecificationAlpina B10
4471 mmLength4775 mm
1739 mmWidth1800 mm
1395 mmHeight1415 mm
1450 KgWeight1540 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Alpina B3 and 1999 Alpina B10 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…