2002 • Ford
Contour
Ford Contour 2.0i 16V (132 Hp) 2002Overall Score63.25/100
2002 Ford Contour vs 2014 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2014 • Volkswagen
Caddy
Volkswagen Caddy 2.0 (109 Hp) 2014Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Ford Contour
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 6 points.
63.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford ContourSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
FordMakeVolkswagen
ContourModelCaddy
2002Model year2014
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
4Doors5
Performance
Ford ContourSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
—0–100 km/h13,8 s
180 km/hTop speed169 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
132 HPPower109 HP
174 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford ContourSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
PetrolFuel typePetrol / CNG
61 ltFuel tank13 lt
—Urban consumption11,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,9 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford ContourSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14 VTyre size—
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Ford ContourSpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
4658 mmLength4406 mm
1749 mmWidth1794 mm
1374 mmHeight1823 mm
1320 KgWeight1568 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2681 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Contour and 2014 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 6 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…