2002 • Renault
Megane
Renault Megane 2.0 IDE 16V (140 Hp) 2002Overall Score62.5/100
2002 Renault Megane vs 2002 Ford Contour Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Ford
Contour
Ford Contour 2.0i 16V (132 Hp) 2002Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Ford Contour
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault MeganeSpecificationFord Contour
RenaultMakeFord
MeganeModelContour
2002Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Renault MeganeSpecificationFord Contour
9,0 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
140 HPPower132 HP
200 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault MeganeSpecificationFord Contour
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank61 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption—
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,6 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault MeganeSpecificationFord Contour
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/50 R16Tyre size185/70 R14 V
YesABS—
Dimensions
Renault MeganeSpecificationFord Contour
4082 mmLength4658 mm
1698 mmWidth1749 mm
1368 mmHeight1374 mm
1200 KgWeight1320 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2704 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Renault Megane and 2002 Ford Contour approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…