2002 • Ford
Contour
Ford Contour 2.0i 16V (132 Hp) 2002Overall Score63.25/100
2002 Ford Contour vs 2002 Renault Megane Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Renault
Megane
Renault Megane 2.0 IDE 16V (140 Hp) 2002Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Ford Contour
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford ContourSpecificationRenault Megane
FordMakeRenault
ContourModelMegane
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Ford ContourSpecificationRenault Megane
—0–100 km/h9,0 s
180 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
132 HPPower140 HP
174 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford ContourSpecificationRenault Megane
PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford ContourSpecificationRenault Megane
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14 VTyre size195/50 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Ford ContourSpecificationRenault Megane
4658 mmLength4082 mm
1749 mmWidth1698 mm
1374 mmHeight1368 mm
1320 KgWeight1200 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2468 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Contour and 2002 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…