DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Ford Contour vs 2002 Renault Laguna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Contour

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
ContourModelLaguna
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,8 s
180 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1988 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
132 HPPower140 HP
174 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption10,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14 VTyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4658 mmLength4575 mm
1749 mmWidth1772 mm
1374 mmHeight1429 mm
1320 KgWeight1300 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2740 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Ford Contour and 2002 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Contour leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…