DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Trafic vs 2016 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Trafic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

64.5–64.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
TraficModelC-Max
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeMpv
9Seats—
4Doors—

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
169 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
125 HPPower125 HP
320 NmTorque159 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—TransmissionManual
215/65 R16Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4999 mmLength4379 mm
1956 mmWidth1858 mm
1971 mmHeight1610 mm
1807 KgWeight1374 kg
—Luggage capacity432 lt
3098 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Ford C-MaxDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Trafic and 2016 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Trafic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…