2016 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max Titanium 2016 1.5 TDCI 120 HPOverall Score69.5/100
2016 Ford C-Max vs 2016 Toyota Proace Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Toyota
Proace
Toyota Proace 1.5d (120 Hp) 2016Overall Score69.75/100
WINNER
Toyota Proace
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
69.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationToyota Proace
FordMakeToyota
C-MaxModelProace
2016Model year2016
MpvBody typeMinivan
—Seats5/6
—Doors4/5
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationToyota Proace
12,4 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
300 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationToyota Proace
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank69 lt
4,7 ltUrban consumption5,2 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationToyota Proace
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
PowershiftTransmission—
16Tyre size215/65 R16; 225/55 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationToyota Proace
4379 mmLength4609 mm
1858 mmWidth1920 mm
1610 mmHeight1905 mm
1472 kgWeight—
432 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2925 mm
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford C-Max and 2016 Toyota Proace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Proace leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…