2016 • Renault
Megane
Renault Megane 1.6 Energy dCi (130 Hp) 2016Overall Score69.75/100
2016 Renault Megane vs 2016 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max Titanium 2016 1.5 TDCI 120 HPOverall Score69.5/100
WINNER
Renault Megane
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
69.75–69.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Renault MeganeSpecificationFord C-Max
RenaultMakeFord
MeganeModelC-Max
2016Model year2016
CoupeBody typeMpv
5Seats—
3Doors—
Performance
Renault MeganeSpecificationFord C-Max
9,8 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
200 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
130 HPPower120 HP
320 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Renault MeganeSpecificationFord C-Max
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption4,7 lt
3,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
4,1 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Renault MeganeSpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—TransmissionPowershift
205/55 R16 91H; 205/50 R17 89V; 225/40 R18Tyre size16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Renault MeganeSpecificationFord C-Max
4299 mmLength4379 mm
1785 mmWidth1858 mm
1423 mmHeight1610 mm
1320 KgWeight1472 kg
—Luggage capacity432 lt
2640 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Renault Megane and 2016 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Renault Megane leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…