2012 • Alpina
B3
Alpina B3 3.0i Biturbo (214 HP) 2012Overall Score76.75/100
2012 Alpina B3 vs 2012 Cadillac CTS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Cadillac
CTS
Cadillac CTS 2.8L V6 SFI (211 Hp) 2012Overall Score76.5/100
WINNER
Alpina B3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
76.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alpina B3SpecificationCadillac CTS
AlpinaMakeCadillac
B3ModelCTS
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Alpina B3SpecificationCadillac CTS
6,9 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
244 km/hTop speed225 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
214 HPPower211 HP
450 NmTorque246 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Alpina B3SpecificationCadillac CTS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank68 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption—
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Alpina B3SpecificationCadillac CTS
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/40 R18ZRTyre size—
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Alpina B3SpecificationCadillac CTS
4580 mmLength4829 mm
1782 mmWidth1793 mm
1395 mmHeight1440 mm
—Weight1765 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2880 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Alpina B3 and 2012 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…