DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Audi A6 vs 2012 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

76.5–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A6SpecificationAlpina B3
AudiMakeAlpina
A6ModelB3
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

Audi A6SpecificationAlpina B3
7,9 s0–100 km/h6,9 s
242 km/hTop speed244 km/h
2773 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
204 HPPower214 HP
280 NmTorque450 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A6SpecificationAlpina B3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank63 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption6,7 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A6SpecificationAlpina B3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/60 R16Tyre size245/40 R18ZR
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi A6SpecificationAlpina B3
4926 mmLength4580 mm
1874 mmWidth1782 mm
1468 mmHeight1395 mm
1570 KgWeight—
2912 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Audi A6 and 2012 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…