2012 • Alpina
B3
Alpina B3 3.0i Biturbo (214 HP) 2012Overall Score76.75/100
2012 Alpina B3 vs 2012 SsangYong Chairman Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • SsangYong
Chairman
SsangYong Chairman 3.2 (224 Hp) 2012Overall Score77.5/100
WINNER
SsangYong Chairman
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
76.75–77.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alpina B3SpecificationSsangYong Chairman
AlpinaMakeSsangYong
B3ModelChairman
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Alpina B3SpecificationSsangYong Chairman
6,9 s0–100 km/h—
244 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement3199 cc
214 HPPower224 HP
450 NmTorque296 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Alpina B3SpecificationSsangYong Chairman
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank83 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption14,3 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption10,1 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption12,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Alpina B3SpecificationSsangYong Chairman
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears7 T-tronic
245/40 R18ZRTyre size245/45 R19
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Alpina B3SpecificationSsangYong Chairman
4580 mmLength5135 mm
1782 mmWidth1895 mm
1395 mmHeight1495 mm
—Weight1948 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2970 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Alpina B3 and 2012 SsangYong Chairman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, SsangYong Chairman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…