2012 • Alpina
B3
Alpina B3 3.0i Biturbo (214 HP) 2012Overall Score76.75/100
2012 Alpina B3 vs 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Sport Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Land Rover
Range Rover Sport
Land Rover Range Rover Sport Range 3.0 LR-TD V6 (211 Hp) 2012Overall Score76.5/100
WINNER
Alpina B3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
76.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Alpina B3SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Sport
AlpinaMakeLand Rover
B3ModelRange Rover Sport
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Alpina B3SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Sport
6,9 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
244 km/hTop speed193 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
214 HPPower211 HP
450 NmTorque520 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Alpina B3SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Sport
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank84 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Alpina B3SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Sport
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
245/40 R18ZRTyre size—
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Alpina B3SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Sport
4580 mmLength4783 mm
1782 mmWidth—
1395 mmHeight1784 mm
—Weight2535-2670 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2745 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Alpina B3 and 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Sport approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…