2008 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCI (136 Hp) 2008Overall Score67.75/100
2008 Ford C-Max vs 2008 Saab 9-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0 i 16V t (150 Hp) 2008Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Saab 9-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationSaab 9-3
FordMakeSaab
C-MaxModel9-3
2008Model year2008
MPVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationSaab 9-3
9,6 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationSaab 9-3
4372 mmLength4635 mm
1825 mmWidth1762 mm
1595 mmHeight1466 mm
1506 KgWeight1440 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Ford C-Max and 2008 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…