2008 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0 i 16V t (150 Hp) 2008Overall Score68.5/100
2008 Saab 9-3 vs 2008 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCI (136 Hp) 2008Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Saab 9-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord C-Max
SaabMakeFord
9-3ModelC-Max
2008Model year2008
SedanBody typeMPV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord C-Max
9,5 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
210 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower136 HP
240 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/60 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord C-Max
4635 mmLength4372 mm
1762 mmWidth1825 mm
1466 mmHeight1595 mm
1440 KgWeight1506 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Saab 9-3 and 2008 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…