2003 • Toyota
Vista
Toyota Vista 2.0 i 16V 4 WD (135 Hp) 2003Overall Score65.5/100
2003 Toyota Vista vs 2003 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi (136 Hp) 2003Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Toyota Vista
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota VistaSpecificationFord C-Max
ToyotaMakeFord
VistaModelC-Max
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMPV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Toyota VistaSpecificationFord C-Max
—0–100 km/h9,6 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
135 HPPower136 HP
181 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota VistaSpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
12 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota VistaSpecificationFord C-Max
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
185/70 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota VistaSpecificationFord C-Max
4670 mmLength4330 mm
1695 mmWidth1820 mm
1510 mmHeight1600 mm
1390 KgWeight1391 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Toyota Vista and 2003 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Vista leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…