DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford C-Max vs 2003 Volkswagen Golf Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Golf

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolkswagen
C-MaxModelGolf
2003Model year2003
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
200 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
136 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption9,9 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4330 mmLength4204 mm
1820 mmWidth1759 mm
1600 mmHeight1485 mm
1391 KgWeight1279 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford C-Max and 2003 Volkswagen Golf approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Golf leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…