DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford C-Max vs 2003 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
C-MaxModelScenic
2003Model year2003
MPVBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
200 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower163 HP
320 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4330 mmLength4259 mm
1820 mmWidth1810 mm
1600 mmHeight1620 mm
1391 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase2685 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford C-Max and 2003 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…