DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford C-Max vs 2003 Nissan Avenir Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Avenir

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
C-MaxModelAvenir
2003Model year2003
MPVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size195/70/R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4330 mmLength4650 mm
1820 mmWidth1695 mm
1600 mmHeight1490 mm
1391 KgWeight1390 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford C-Max and 2003 Nissan Avenir approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Avenir leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…