2004 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.8 16V (120 Hp) 2004Overall Score54.25/100
2004 Ford C-Max vs 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Alfa Romeo
156
Alfa Romeo 156 1.6 i 16V T.Spark (120 Hp) 2004Overall Score53.5/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
FordMakeAlfa Romeo
C-MaxModel156
2004Model year2004
MPVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
10,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
193 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
165 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank63 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
4330 mmLength4435 mm
1820 mmWidth1743 mm
1600 mmHeight1430 mm
1287 KgWeight1265 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2595 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Ford C-Max and 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…