DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 David Brown Mini Remastered vs 2016 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

David Brown Mini Remastered

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

48.5–48.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

David BrownMakeFord
Mini RemasteredModelC-Max
2017Model year2016
CoupeBody typeMPV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h15,9 s
145 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1275 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
71 HPPower85 HP
118 NmTorque141 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank53 lt
5,5 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
—Average consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16; 215/55 R16; 215/50 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3050 mmLength4379 mm
1470 mmWidth1828 mm
1330 mmHeight1626 mm
740 KgWeight1374 Kg
2040 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 David Brown Mini Remastered and 2016 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, David Brown Mini Remastered leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…