2016 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 Ti-VCT (85 Hp) 2016Overall Score48.25/100
2016 Ford C-Max vs 2016 Toyota Proace Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Toyota
Proace
Toyota Proace 1.6 D4-D (90 Hp) 2016Overall Score47.5/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
48.25–47.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationToyota Proace
FordMakeToyota
C-MaxModelProace
2016Model year2016
MPVBody typeMinivan
5Seats3
5Doors5
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationToyota Proace
15,9 s0–100 km/h16,5 s
165 km/hTop speed145 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
85 HPPower90 HP
141 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationToyota Proace
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
53 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,4 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationToyota Proace
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16; 215/55 R16; 215/50 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationToyota Proace
4379 mmLength4813 mm
1828 mmWidth1895 mm
1626 mmHeight1980 mm
1374 KgWeight1736-1848 Kg
—Wheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford C-Max and 2016 Toyota Proace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…