DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Ford C-Max vs 2006 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

61.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan AD
FordMakeNissan
C-MaxModelAD
2006Model year2006
MPVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan AD
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
90 HPPower109 HP
215 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan AD
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank41 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan AD
4333 mmLength4395 mm
1825 mmWidth1695 mm
—Height1500 mm
—Weight1250 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Ford C-Max and 2006 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…