2006 • Mini
Hatch
Mini Hatch 1.6 i 16V (116 Hp) 2006Overall Score62.5/100
2006 Mini Hatch vs 2006 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 TDCi (90 Hp) 2006Overall Score61.5/100
WINNER
Mini Hatch
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
62.5–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mini HatchSpecificationFord C-Max
MiniMakeFord
HatchModelC-Max
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeMPV
4Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Mini HatchSpecificationFord C-Max
9,2 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
116 HPPower90 HP
150 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mini HatchSpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mini HatchSpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
175/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mini HatchSpecificationFord C-Max
3626 mmLength4333 mm
1688 mmWidth1825 mm
1408 mmHeight—
1125 KgWeight—
2467 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Mini Hatch and 2006 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mini Hatch leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…