DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Ford C-Max vs 2010 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford C-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan AD
FordMakeNissan
C-MaxModelAD
2010Model year2010
MPVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan AD
11,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
240 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan AD
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank41 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
YesABS—

Dimensions

Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan AD
—Length4395 mm
1825 mmWidth1695 mm
1595-1601 mmHeight1500 mm
2640 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Ford C-Max and 2010 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…