DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan AD vs 2010 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford C-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationFord C-Max
NissanMakeFord
ADModelC-Max
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationFord C-Max
—0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
148 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank55 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationFord C-Max
4395 mmLength—
1695 mmWidth1825 mm
1500 mmHeight1595-1601 mm
2600 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan AD and 2010 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…