DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Alpina B3 vs 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 31 points.

93.5–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AlpinaMakeAlfa Romeo
B3Model156
2017Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

4,1 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
298 km/hTop speed216 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement1970 cc
410 HPPower155 HP
600 NmTorque187 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank63 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
8 Switch-TronicGears5
245/30 ZR20; 265/30 ZR20Tyre size205/60R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4632 mmLength4430 mm
1811 mmWidth1745 mm
1431 mmHeight1415 mm
1705 KgWeight1250 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Alpina B3 and 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 31 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…