DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Jaguar XF vs 2017 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

92.5–93.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina B3
JaguarMakeAlpina
XFModelB3
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina B3
5,3 s0–100 km/h4,1 s
250 km/hTop speed298 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
380 HPPower410 HP
450 NmTorque600 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina B3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
8,3 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina B3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
8Gears8 Switch-Tronic
—Tyre size245/30 ZR20; 265/30 ZR20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Jaguar XFSpecificationAlpina B3
4954 mmLength4632 mm
1987 mmWidth1811 mm
1457 mmHeight1431 mm
1710 KgWeight1705 Kg
2960 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Jaguar XF and 2017 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…