DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Alpina B3 vs 2017 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

93.5–92.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alpina B3SpecificationJaguar XF
AlpinaMakeJaguar
B3ModelXF
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Alpina B3SpecificationJaguar XF
4,1 s0–100 km/h5,3 s
298 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
410 HPPower380 HP
600 NmTorque450 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Alpina B3SpecificationJaguar XF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank74 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Alpina B3SpecificationJaguar XF
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8 Switch-TronicGears8
245/30 ZR20; 265/30 ZR20Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Alpina B3SpecificationJaguar XF
4632 mmLength4954 mm
1811 mmWidth1987 mm
1431 mmHeight1457 mm
1705 KgWeight1710 Kg
2810 mmWheelbase2960 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Alpina B3 and 2017 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…