DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Ford Bronco vs 1996 Mercury Mountaineer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Mountaineer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.75–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMercury
BroncoModelMountaineer
1992Model year1996
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,3 s
0 km/hTop speed177 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
188 HPPower218 HP
366 NmTorque391 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
121 ltFuel tank79 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption16,8 lt
14,7 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt
16,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
235/75 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4663 mmLength4790 mm
2009 mmWidth1875 mm
1892 mmHeight1830 mm
—Weight1950 Kg
2659 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Ford Bronco and 1996 Mercury Mountaineer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Mountaineer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…